Main navigation

  • Home
  • About
    • Methodology
    • A Brief History of PRE
    • Funding and Support
  • Evaluations
  • Plants
  • Organizations
  • Community
  • Projects

User account menu

  • Log in
PRE — Plant Risk Evaluator

Eragrostis echinochloidea -- California

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Issues

Evaluation Summary


Evaluation Date:  2024-09-23

Screener:  Melanie Davis
 
Plant:  Eragrostis echinochloidea
Common Name(s):
African lovegrass

State:  California

PRE Score:  19
Questions Answered:  20
Screener Confidence (%):  78

Executive Summary

Erogrostis echinochloidea Staph (Poaceae), commonly African lovegrass, is a perennial grass that can reach up to a meter tall. It is native to arid regions of South Africa and has been newly documented in California as of 2020. It has been slowly spread throughout the southwest in Arizona and Mexico where it was introduced the 1940's, possibly with the Soil Conservation Service, and favors disturbed sites, roadsides, clay flats, grassy flats, slopes, river margins, cultivated areas, parking lots, sidewalks, gravel, near highways, vacant lots and cattle farms. Erogrostis echinochloidea primarily reproduces sexually through germination, and while has the potential for asexual, or vegetative, reproduction, it is slow spreading. This species is considered introduced or naturalized where it is found, likely because of it's slow growth rates. Here, we find that it should be considered a species of concern in climates like California's, likely for its ecological preferences, ability to generate a high number of viable seeds, long flowering period, because it can contribute to fine fuels that drive wildfires, and because it's adaptation to regions drier than California. Members of the Eragrostis genus have been found to be adapted to fire and can re-sprout vigorously after burning. This species is moderately palatable to livestock and has not been found to be toxic. Recommended mechanisms for removal of species in this genus that are considered invasive include include grazing, herbicide treatments, mechanical, and manual removal.

Climate Matching Map

Attachment Size
climatematch-eragrostis_echinochloidea-california-20240922.pdf (1.1 MB) 1.1 MB

1. Question 1

Yes
1
Very High
Eragrostis echinochloidea is native to South Africa and is introduced in Arizona, California, northern Mexico, and Israel. It is considered naturalized in Arizona and Mexico. Randall (2017) lists E. echinochloidea as naturalized in Europe and Israel, however there is not sufficient evidence with species documentation to support this as there are very little documentation of this taxon in these regions. In Arizona and Mexico, however, it is well supported in literature, management, and documentation that this taxon is naturalized.
Randall, R. P. 2017. “A Global Compendium of Weeds. Third Edition”. Dept. of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313645439_A_Global_Compendium_….
2024. “Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf”. https://plants.usda.gov/home/plantProfile?symbol=EREC.
2024. “Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf \textbar EFloraMex - Flora de M\ Exico en L\ \inea [bajo Construcci\ On]”. https://efloramex.ib.unam.mx/cdm_dataportal/taxon/0d987260-131c-4322-84….
van Devender, T.R., R.S. Felger, and M.A. Dinnitt. 2007. “Sonoran Desert Weed Accounts”. In . [United States] : U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. http://archive.org/details/roadsideweedmana00harp.
2024. “ClimateMatch-Eragrostis_echinochloidea-California-20240922.Pdf.”

2. Question 2

Yes
2
Very High
Eragrostis echinochloidea is naturalized in Arizona, which has a similar climate to California (the region in question). Regions that it occupies in Mexico also share a similar climate. Where it is native in South Africa, it can be found in the western Cape and near Johannesburg, which also share a similar climate to California. However, this is the edge of the species distribution in its native range, and it is primarily found in a region of South Africa which does not match the climate of California. Randall (2017) notes that its preferred climates are Mediterranean, Subtropical, and Tropical.
Randall, R. P. 2017. “A Global Compendium of Weeds. Third Edition”. Dept. of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313645439_A_Global_Compendium_….
2024. “ClimateMatch-Eragrostis_echinochloidea-California-20240922.Pdf.”

3. Question 3

Yes
2
High
Eragrostis echinochloidea is considered invasive in Mexico by Randall (2017). Randall cites a 2006 web page from Conabio that is no longer available and since 2006 there have been regulation changes regarding the definition changes of 'invasiveness' in Mexico, and because I was unable to find Eragrostris echinochloidea on any recent lists I can only assume that it is not longer considered invasive here.
However, Pima County (Webb 2020) considers this species as invasive where it has spread from roadsides into multiple ecosystems.
Randall, R. P. 2017. “A Global Compendium of Weeds. Third Edition”. Dept. of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313645439_A_Global_Compendium_….
errez-Gutierrez, Obed G. Guti\, Otilia Rivero-Hern\ andez, Jos\ e Humberto Vega-Mares, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo, Obed G. Guti\ errez-Gutierrez, Otilia Rivero-Hern\ andez, Jos\ e Humberto Vega-Mares, and Alicia Melgoza-Castillo. 2022. “Patrones de Germinaci\ on en Gram\ \ineas Presentes en El Desierto Chihuahuense”. Botanical Sciences 100: 989-99. doi:10.17129/botsci.3007.
2024. “Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf \textbar EFloraMex - Flora de M\ Exico en L\ \inea [bajo Construcci\ On]”. https://efloramex.ib.unam.mx/cdm_dataportal/taxon/0d987260-131c-4322-84….
2024. “SEINet Portal Network - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/taxa/index.php?taxon=2955\&clid=3130.
Sanchez-Ken, Gabriel. 2012. Catálogo de Malezas Gramíneas Nativas E Introducidas de México. Consejo Nacional Consultivo Fitosanitario.
avila, Patricia D\, Ma. Teresa Mejia-Saul\ es, Ana Mar\ \ia Soriano-Mart\ \ inez, and Yolanda Herrera-Arrieta. 2018. “Conocimiento Taxon\ Omico de la Familia Poaceae en M\ Exico”. Botanical Sciences 96: 462-514. doi:10.17129/botsci.1894.
Abarca, Francisco. 2010. “Recent Regulation Changes Regarding Invasive Species in Mexico and the Development of Mexico S National Strategy on Invasive Species”. https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/migrated/invasivespecies/intern….
Webb, A.D. 2020. “Pima County Ecological Monitoring Program S Monitoring Protocol for Tracking Invasive Plant Occurrences. Ecological Monitoring Program, Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan”. Tucson, Arizona, USA: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/ff3c4d87-890b-41d3-8195-b770a6….

4. Question 4

Yes
3
High
While the species is not widely considered invasive, Pima County has included it in invasive species monitoring programs where it is noted as "invading multiple ecosystems types including desert, thornscrub, semi-desert grasslands, xeric riparian areas, and mesic riparian areas...African lovegrass may pose a threat to MSCP covered species, particularly
in thornscrub and desert areas where it alters vegetation structure and provides a source of
fine fuels for wildfires." (Webb 2020). Pima County, Arizona, does have a similar climate to California.
2024. “ClimateMatch-Eragrostis_echinochloidea-California-20240922.Pdf.”
Webb, A.D. 2020. “Pima County Ecological Monitoring Program S Monitoring Protocol for Tracking Invasive Plant Occurrences. Ecological Monitoring Program, Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan”. Tucson, Arizona, USA: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/ff3c4d87-890b-41d3-8195-b770a6….

5. Question 5

Yes
1
Very High
Eragrostis is an extensive monophyletic genus with approximately 350 taxa distributed across the word, about 24 of which are introduced outside of their native range. No species of Eragrostis are currently considered invasive in California, however six other non-native species and one subspecies of the genus have been documented in California. Eragrostis lehmanniana, native to South Africa, has become invasive in southwestern United States, primarily Arizona and Mexico, where it was introduced for restoration. The regions of Arizona and Mexico that this species has invaded are a similar climate to California, similar to Eragrostis echinochloidea. This taxon has also been found in California and should be considered for a PRE review.



Ingram, A.L., and J. J. Doyle. 2004. “Is Eragrostis (Poaceae) Monophyletic? Insights from Nuclear and Plastid Sequence Data”. Systematic Botany 29(3):545-552. doi:10.1600/0363644041744392.
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
Peterson, Paul. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis_echinochloidea.
2024. “ClimateMatch-Eragrostis_lehmanniana-California-20240928”. https://weedmap.cal-ipc.org/temp/4619c2870315c6c922aff55d6a0da3d0/Clima….
2024. “Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf, African Love Grass. Calflora: Information on California Plants for Education, Research and Conservation. Berkeley, CA: Calflora Database”. https://www.calflora.org/app/taxon?crn=13657.
Conser, Christiana, Lizbeth Seebacher, David W. Fujino, Sarah Reichard, and Joseph M. DiTomaso. 2015. “The Development of a Plant Risk Evaluation (PRE) Tool for Assessing the Invasive Potential of Ornamental Plants: Erargostis Curvula - Texas”. Edited by Jian Liu 10: e0121053. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121053.

6. Question 6

No
0
High
The majority of this species native range is in Botswana and Namibia, regions that are more arid than the region of concern. In the limited regions that it has become naturalized, the climate does not match that of California. While the Precipitation and Hardiness layers on the Climate Match tool do match the primary native range for this taxon does match southern California and the southwestern desert region, overall the majority of the species range does not match.
2024. “ClimateMatch-Eragrostis_echinochloidea-California-20240922.Pdf.”

7. Question 7

Yes
1
Medium
Eragrostis echinochloidae is a perennial bunch grass that can reach 1 meter tall; the plants grow in dense tufts or clumps and form mats (are cespitose), with erect stems. Plants that form dense clumps are capable of stabilizing substrate and potentially causing thick mats, thus have the ability to crowd out natives. However the plant is not a vine and does not have an overhanging cover and would not be at risk of smothering natives. This taxon has been reported as altering vegetation structure where it has invaded multiple ecosystems types including desert, thornscrub, semi-desert grasslands, xeric riparian areas, and mesic riparian areas, and has been reported as a potential threat to MSCP covered and sensitive species in Pima County, AZ.
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
Peterson, Paul. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis_echinochloidea.
Webb, A.D. 2020. “Pima County Ecological Monitoring Program S Monitoring Protocol for Tracking Invasive Plant Occurrences. Ecological Monitoring Program, Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan”. Tucson, Arizona, USA: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/ff3c4d87-890b-41d3-8195-b770a6….

8. Question 8

Yes
1
High
Eragrostis echinochoidea is reported as being capable of initiating grass-fire cycles in USA and provides a source for fine fuels for wildfires. In general, perennial grass dominated ecosystems burn more completely and generate higher temperatures than herbaceous and woody systems. However, it is not reported as forming monocultures where it has invaded, so while it can contribute positively to increased fire risk, it likely won't singularly drive fire.

Webb, A.D. 2020. “Pima County Ecological Monitoring Program S Monitoring Protocol for Tracking Invasive Plant Occurrences. Ecological Monitoring Program, Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan”. Tucson, Arizona, USA: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/ff3c4d87-890b-41d3-8195-b770a6….
Wragg, Peter D., Troy Mielke, and David Tilman. 2018. “Forbs, Grasses, and Grassland Fire Behaviour”. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12980.
Bean, T.M., and C.A. Hannum. 2009. “Invasive Grasses: Cause for Concern. In: Backyards \& Beyond”. 3(3). Tucson, AZ: Arizona CooperativeExtension, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona. 4-5.. https://cales.arizona.edu/backyards/sites/cals.arizona.edu.backyards/fi….
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
Peterson, Paul. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis_echinochloidea.
2024. “SEINet Portal Network - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/taxa/index.php?taxon=2955\&clid=3130.

9. Question 9

No
0
Very High
Eragrostis echinochloidea is was not listed by CDFA (2015) as a noxious weed and is not included in the Cornell list of poisonous plants (2018) nor listed in the California Poison Control System (2023). It was potentially introduced to the US for the regeneration of rangelands and as a forage grass, however it does not have a high forage value and has a rating of moderate grazing value. Thus, while it might not be the most palatable forage grass, it is not toxic and does not pose as a health risk.
Irob, K, S Blaum, L Kerger, B Strohbach, A Kanduvarisa, D. Lohmann, and B Tietjen. 2022. “Browsing Herbivores Improve the State and Functioning of Savannas: A Model Assessment of Alternative Land-Use Strategies”. Ecology and Evolution 12(3):e8715. doi:10.1002/ece3.8715.
Ravhuhali, Khuliso E, Victor Mlambo, Tefera S Beyene, and Lobina G Palamuleni. 2021. “Effect of Soil Type on Spatial Distribution and Nutritive Value of Grass Species Growing in Selected Rangelands of South Africa”. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 38: 361-71. doi:10.1080/02571862.2021.1933630.
Dougill, A. J., and A. D. Thomas. 2004. “Kalahari Sand Soils: Spatial Heterogeneity, Biological Soil Crusts and Land Degradation”. Land Degradation \& Development 15: 233-42. doi:10.1002/ldr.611.
Van Devender, Thomas R., and A.L. Reina. 1729. “SONORA”. https://bioone.org/journals/madro\~no/volume-54/issue-1/0024-9637_2007_54_102_S_2.0.CO_2/SONORA/10.3120/0024-9637(2007)54[102:S]2.0.CO;2.full.
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
System, California Poison Control. 2023. “Plants \textperiodcentered California Poison Control System (CPCS)”. https://calpoison.org/topics/plant.
2015. “California Noxious Weed List”. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA. http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/IPC/encycloweedia/weedinfo/winfo_table-sci….
Science, Cornell University Department of Animal. 2018. “Plants Poisonous to Livestock”. https://poisonousplants.ansci.cornell.edu/alphalist.html.

10. Question 10

No
0
Very High
Eragrostis echinochloidae is a perennial bunch grass that can reach 1 meter tall; the plants grow in dense tufts or clumps and form mats (are cespitose), with erect stems (culms). Plants that form dense clumps are capable of stabilizing substrate and potentially causing thick mats, however due to this plants height and lack of thorns, it does not prove as a physical barrier to humans, animals, or livestock.
Peterson, Paul. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis_echinochloidea.

11. Question 11

Yes
1
Medium
Eragrostis echinochloidea has been reported as sometimes rooting at the nodes. Species of the Eragrostis genus can be stoloniferous or rhizomatous. There is very little other documentation of this taxon spreading or reproducing vegetatively, so while it has been reported that it can, this does not seem to be the primary mode of reproduction.

Peterson, Paul. M. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Wolf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis.
2024. “SEINet Portal Network - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/taxa/index.php?taxon=2955\&clid=3130.
2024. “Tropicos - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://www.tropicos.org/name/25515159.

12. Question 12

No
0
High
As stated in question 11, Eragrostis echinochloidea has been reported as having the ability to root at the nodes, however this is not a common method of reproduction.
Peterson, Paul. M. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Wolf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis.
2024. “SEINet Portal Network - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/taxa/index.php?taxon=2955\&clid=3130.
2024. “Tropicos - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://www.tropicos.org/name/25515159.

13. Question 13

Yes
1
Very High
Eragrostis echinochoildea primarily reproduces from seed.

errez-Gutierrez, Obed G. Guti\, Otilia Rivero-Hern\ andez, Jos\ e Humberto Vega-Mares, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo, Obed G. Guti\ errez-Gutierrez, Otilia Rivero-Hern\ andez, Jos\ e Humberto Vega-Mares, and Alicia Melgoza-Castillo. 2022. “Patrones de Germinaci\ on en Gram\ \ineas Presentes en El Desierto Chihuahuense”. Botanical Sciences 100: 989-99. doi:10.17129/botsci.3007.
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
Peterson, Paul. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis_echinochloidea.
2024. “SEINet Portal Network - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/taxa/index.php?taxon=2955\&clid=3130.
2024. “Tropicos - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://www.tropicos.org/name/25515159.

14. Question 14

Yes
1
High
I was unable to find calculations in the literature of the number of viable seed Eragrostis echinochloidea can produce however I was able to ascertain an approximate number by calculating the average fertile florets per spikelet (5-16) and spikelets per raceme (~10) using numbers provided in the taxon's treatment. An individual inflorescence can easily produce on average 100 viable seeds per year, thus, a single plant would only need to produce 10 inflorescences per year. Personal observation of 147 verified photo occurrences on iNaturalist show that is not an uncommon occurrence, however it depends on the size of the individual plant. Young plants appear to be producing
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
2024. INaturalist - Worldwide Observations of Erarostis Echinochloidea. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?quality_grade=research\&taxon_id=162385.
Peterson, Paul. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis_echinochloidea.
2024. “SEINet Portal Network - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/taxa/index.php?taxon=2955\&clid=3130.
2024. “Tropicos - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://www.tropicos.org/name/25515159.

15. Question 15

Yes
1
Medium
Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez et al. (2022) reports that germination of seeds occur in about 2 days after being stored in paper bags at 24C (75.2F) for 2-3 years after being cleaned, however germination rate was low, at less than 3%. These results are from a lab setting.
However, other species in the Eragrostis genus have well documented germination rates. Eragrostis plana showed high germination rates (up to 98%) in optimal simulated conditions (Bittencourt et al 2017). Bittencourt et al (2016) also found a 85% germination rate of Eragrostis tenuifolia in a similar study. In an experiment testing seed treatments on Eragrostis lehmanniana, Haferkamp and Jordan (1977) found that the control sample had a germination rate of 36% just 48 hours after imbibition. In an earlier study, Wright (1973) found germination of untreated Eragrostis lehmanniana seeds to be as high as 80% 150 weeks post-harvest.
The ample evidence that Eragrostris species have high germination rates imply that E. echinochloidea would too given a more controlled experiment. Thus, I am answering Yes with a Medium confidence here.
errez-Gutierrez, Obed G. Guti\, Otilia Rivero-Hern\ andez, Jos\ e Humberto Vega-Mares, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo, Obed G. Guti\ errez-Gutierrez, Otilia Rivero-Hern\ andez, Jos\ e Humberto Vega-Mares, and Alicia Melgoza-Castillo. 2022. “Patrones de Germinaci\ on en Gram\ \ineas Presentes en El Desierto Chihuahuense”. Botanical Sciences 100: 989-99. doi:10.17129/botsci.3007.
Bittencourt, Henrique von Hertwig, Lisandro Tomas da Silva Bonome, Fortunato de Bortoli Pagnoncelli, Marcos Alberto Lana, and Michelangelo Muzell Trezzi. 2016. “Seed Germination and Emergence of Eragrostis Tenuifolia (A. Rich.) Hochst. Ex Steud. In Response to Environmental Factors”. Journal of Plant Protection Research vol. 56. doi:10.1515/jppr-2016-0005.
Bittencourt, H. V. H., L. T. S. Bonome, M. M. Trezzi, R. A. Vidal, and M. A. Lana. 2017. “Seed Germination Ecology of Eragrostis Plana, an Invasive Weed of South American Pasture Lands”. South African Journal of Botany 109: 246-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.01.009.
Haferkamp, Marshall R., and Gilbert L. Jordan. 1977. “The Effect of Selected Presowing Seed Treatments on Germination of Lehmann Lovegrass Seeds”. Journal of Range Management 30: 151-53. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3897760.

16. Question 16

Yes
1
Very Low
CABI states that it has been reported that Eragrostis echinochloidea has a slow growth rate, however I was unable to verify this with the listed source (out of commission site). I was also unable to find any observations or reports regarding the amount of time it takes this species to develop fruit.
However, many perennial grasses, including species of Eragrostis, produce seed within three years; Eragrostis secundiflora produces viable seed within the first year of planting (Maher and Reilley 2016).
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
Maher, S, and J Reilley. 2016. “Plant Guide for Red Lovegrass (Eragrostis Secundiflora)”. Kingsville, Texas 78363.

17. Question 17

Yes
1
Very High
Two sources (CalFlora and Flora of Israel) site this taxon of having a 1-2 month flowering period, however the sample size for both of these sources are unknown, and assumed to be small as vouchering of the taxon in California and Isreal is minimal. California Consortium of Herbaria list flowering time as in the spring and fall (February, April, September, and October) with a sample size of 9, however some of the vouchers used here were collected in South Africa, which, being in the Southern Hemisphere, has opposite seasons from the United States. That being said, in looking at verified iNaturalist photo observations in South Africa, Eragrostis echinochloidea can be found flowering throughout all 12 months of the year (n=72). In the Northern Hemisphere this species has been documented on iNaturalist (verified photos) as flowering almost every month out of the year, excluding January, July, and December (n=75). While it is unknown of one individual will produce seeds more than twice a year, it is appears that seeds can be continuously produced for over three months out of the year.
Danin, Avinoam, and Ori Fragman-Sapir. 2023. “Analytical Flora Flora of Israel and Adjacent Areas Flora of Israel and Adjacent Areas”. https://flora.org.il:443/en/plants/systematics/pulicaria/.
2024. INaturalist - Worldwide Observations of Erarostis Echinochloidea. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?quality_grade=research\&taxon_id=162385.
2024. “Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf, African Love Grass. Calflora: Information on California Plants for Education, Research and Conservation. Berkeley, CA: Calflora Database”. https://www.calflora.org/app/taxon?crn=13657.
2024. CCH2 Portal Collection Search Parameters - Erarostris Echinochloidea. https://www.cch2.org/portal/collections/.

18. Question 18

No
0
Low
Eragrostis echinochloidea can be found throughout grazing rangeland, and some assessments have speculated that with proximity to livestock, the species could use animals as a vector, especially because of the minuscule size of the seeds (
Ravhuhali, Khuliso E, Victor Mlambo, Tefera S Beyene, and Lobina G Palamuleni. 2021. “Effect of Soil Type on Spatial Distribution and Nutritive Value of Grass Species Growing in Selected Rangelands of South Africa”. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 38: 361-71. doi:10.1080/02571862.2021.1933630.
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
Peterson, Paul M. 2021. “Flora of North America: Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis_echinochloidea.

19. Question 19

Yes
1
High
Eragrostis echinochloidea is naturalized and native to arid regions and is not generally find in wet environments, therefore dispersal via water is unlikely. However, this species, and its close relatives are dispersed via wind and have seed morphology that aides in distance wind dispersal (such as winged palea), which it shares with other naturalized members of the Eragrostis genus.
2014. “Field Guide for Managing Lehmann and Weeping Lovegrasses in the Southwest”. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region. 10.
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.
Peterson, Paul. 2024. “Flora of North America - Eragrostis Echinochloidea Stapf”. http://beta.floranorthamerica.org/Eragrostis_echinochloidea.
2024. “SEINet Portal Network - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/taxa/index.php?taxon=2955\&clid=3130.
2024. “Tropicos - Eragrostis Echinochloidea”. https://www.tropicos.org/name/25515159.

20. Question 20

Yes
1
Medium
This species presence near highways, lots, disturbed sites and cattle farms suggests it is moving with vehicles, or otherwise anthropogenically. In Mexico, E. echinochloidea was first reported as an escaped forage grass in 2001 near a toll station of Road 15 at Magdalena de Kino, Sonora.

van Devender, T.R., R.S. Felger, and M.A. Dinnitt. 2007. “Sonoran Desert Weed Accounts”. In . [United States] : U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. http://archive.org/details/roadsideweedmana00harp.
Webb, A.D. 2020. “Pima County Ecological Monitoring Program S Monitoring Protocol for Tracking Invasive Plant Occurrences. Ecological Monitoring Program, Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan”. Tucson, Arizona, USA: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/ff3c4d87-890b-41d3-8195-b770a6….
Bowers, Janice E., and Raymond M. Turner. 1985. “A Revised Vascular Flora of Tumamoc Hill, Tucson, Arizona”. Madro\~no 32: 225-52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41424550.
Reeder, J.R., and C.G. Redder. 1985. “Notes on Arizona Grasses”. Desert Plants 7(1):22-23. The University of Arizona. Tucson, AZ.. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/554184/dp_07_01-0…\&isAllowed=y.
errez-Gutierrez, Obed G. Guti\, Otilia Rivero-Hern\ andez, Jos\ e Humberto Vega-Mares, Alicia Melgoza-Castillo, Obed G. Guti\ errez-Gutierrez, Otilia Rivero-Hern\ andez, Jos\ e Humberto Vega-Mares, and Alicia Melgoza-Castillo. 2022. “Patrones de Germinaci\ on en Gram\ \ineas Presentes en El Desierto Chihuahuense”. Botanical Sciences 100: 989-99. doi:10.17129/botsci.3007.
Van Devender, Thomas R., and A.L. Reina. 1729. “SONORA”. https://bioone.org/journals/madro\~no/volume-54/issue-1/0024-9637_2007_54_102_S_2.0.CO_2/SONORA/10.3120/0024-9637(2007)54[102:S]2.0.CO;2.full.
2022. Eragrostis Echinochloidea. doi:10.1079/cabicompendium.114152.

Total PRE Score

19
20
78

PRE Score Legend

The PRE Score is calculated by adding the point totals for each (answered) question.

< 13 : Low Potential Risk
13 - 15 : Moderate Potential Risk
> 15 : High Potential Risk

Questions Answered Legend

It is important to answer at least 16 questions to consider a PRE Score as "valid".

≥ 16 : Valid (80% or more questions answered)
≤ 15 : Invalid (not enough questions answered)

Evaluation Credits and Citation


Screener:  Melanie Davis

 

Below is a recommend citation when referencing this evaluation in other works:

Davis, Melanie. "Eragrostis echinochloidea -- California" Plant Risk Evaluator (PRE) published 2024-09-23 https://pretool.org/evaluations/4930

 


Please cite this evaluation. We need your support here!

PRE Evaluations take a long time to research, so please credit this site and evaluation appropriately.


Evaluation Reviewers

Chris McDonald reviewed on 2025-02-21
Elizabeth Brusati reviewed on 2025-02-07
Jutta Burger reviewed on 2025-01-29
Nicole Valentine reviewed on 2025-01-07
Ron Vanderhoff reviewed on 2024-10-09

 

Associated Project

2023-2025 Western IPM Project

This project intends to support the expanded use of the online PRE tool to more Western States and nations, and to explore the use of the PRE results for each partner region. Along with the direct benefit from the plant assessments, this project will also provide a platform through which to collaborate on a range of efforts related to preventing introduction of invasive plants through horticulture. Each partner can share their expertise on effort such as providing information on safe landscaping alternatives, surveying nurseries for data on what is being sold, comparing species priorities.

 

Associated Organizations, Agencies, and Institutions

California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC)

 

Copyright © 2025 PRETool.org - All rights reserved